File #2822: "2020_Book_JudicialActivismAndTheDemocrat.pdf"
Testo
1|Acknowledgements|6
1|Contents|7
1|Chapter 1: Judicial Activism and Its Intersection with Democratic Rule of Law|11
2|1.1 Introduction: On the Notion of Judicial Activism|11
2|1.2 Case 1: Québec Inc. c Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales, 2019 QCCA 373 (Quebec Inc. v. Director of Criminal ...|17
3|1.2.1 Appropriating the Judicial Activism of the Left to Imbue a Corporation with Dignity|20
3|1.2.2 Analysis of Quebec Inc. with Reference to Forms of Judicial Activism|22
3|1.2.3 Additional Comments on Quebec Inc. v. Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions|32
2|1.3 Case 2: Vavilov v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 132 (Federal Court of Appeal of Canada), SCC ...|34
3|1.3.1 Textualism and Human Rights Issues in the Vavilov Case|36
3|1.3.2 `Principled Judicial Activism´ in Defense of Human Rights and the Democratic Rule of Law|50
3|1.3.3 Judicial Activism in Defense of the Vulnerable|56
2|References|58
2|Literature|58
2|Materials|58
2|Cases|59
1|Chapter 2: The Supreme Court of the United States and Judicial Activism in the Trump Era|60
2|2.1 Introduction|60
2|2.2 Case 1: Rucho et al. v. Common Cause et al. No. 18-422. Argued March 26, 2019-Decided June 27, 2019 (United States Supreme...|62
2|2.3 Case 2: Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, In...|68
2|2.4 Case 3: Garza (Guardian ad litem for J.D.) v. Hargan (Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services) et al. 874 F.3d 735 (...|82
2|2.5 The Supreme Court of the United States Holding in Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Plan...|85
2|2.6 Case 4: Gamble v United States No. 17-646. Argued December 6, 2018-Decided June 17, 2019 (United States Supreme Court, 201...|99
2|2.7 Case 5: American Legion v. American Humanist Association, No. 17-1717 (Decided 20 June, 2019) (United States Supreme Court...|113
2|2.8 Case 6: Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972) (United States Supreme Court) (A Judicial Dissent Asserting Children´s Au...|121
2|References|131
2|Literature|131
2|Materials|131
2|Cases|132
1|Chapter 3: Judicial Activism in Selected Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of Canada|134
2|3.1 Introduction|134
2|3.2 Case 1: Gillian Frank and Jamie Duong v Attorney General of Canada [Frank v Canada] 2019 SCC 1 Decided 11 January, 2019 (S...|138
2|3.3 Case 2: Fitzgerald (Next Friend) v Alberta A.J. No. 1544, 2002 ABQB 1086; (2004) A.J. No. 570, 2004 ABCA 184 (Court of App...|154
2|3.4 Case 3: Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Attorney General (Canada) 2004 1 SCC 76 (Supreme Court of Ca...|182
3|3.4.1 The Canadian Charter s. 7 `Security of the Person´ Issue in Canadian Foundation|183
3|3.4.2 The Canadian Charter s. 15 `Equality Under the Law´ and `Equal Benefit of the Law´ Issue in Canadian Foundation|188
3|3.4.3 The s. 12 Charter Protection Against Cruel and Unusual Treatment or Punishment Issue in Canadian Foundation|194
2|References|198
2|Literature|198
2|Materials|198
2|Cases|199
1|Chapter 4: Judicial Activism, the `Living Instrument´ Doctrine and the European Court of Human Rights|200
2|4.1 Introduction|200
2|4.2 Case 1: Case of Golder v. The United Kingdom (Application No. 4451/70) Judgement 21 February, 1975 (European Court of Huma...|203
2|4.3 Case 2: Volodina v Russia (Application No. 41261/17) Judgment 9 July, 2019 (European Court of Human Rights) (On the Questi...|216
2|4.4 Case 3: X v The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Application No. 29683/16) Judgement 17 January, 2019 (European Cour...|223
2|References|239
2|Literature|239
2|Materials|239
2|Cases|240
1|Chapter 5: `Principled Judicial Activism´ in Defense of Our Common Humanity|241
2|5.1 Introduction|241
2|5.2 Case 1: Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Gize Yebeyo Araya, et al. SCC, Docket 37919, Judgment Pending (Supreme Court of Canada, J...|244
2|5.3 Case 2: Jesner et al. v Arab Bank PLC (Supreme Court of the United States) Judgement 24 April, 2018, 138 S. Ct. 1386 (2018...|263
2|References|268
2|Literature|268
2|Materials|269
2|Cases|269
1|Chapter 6: Concluding Comment|271
2|References|275
2|Literature|275
2|Materials|276
2|Cases|276
1|Index|278
1|Contents|7
1|Chapter 1: Judicial Activism and Its Intersection with Democratic Rule of Law|11
2|1.1 Introduction: On the Notion of Judicial Activism|11
2|1.2 Case 1: Québec Inc. c Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales, 2019 QCCA 373 (Quebec Inc. v. Director of Criminal ...|17
3|1.2.1 Appropriating the Judicial Activism of the Left to Imbue a Corporation with Dignity|20
3|1.2.2 Analysis of Quebec Inc. with Reference to Forms of Judicial Activism|22
3|1.2.3 Additional Comments on Quebec Inc. v. Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions|32
2|1.3 Case 2: Vavilov v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FCA 132 (Federal Court of Appeal of Canada), SCC ...|34
3|1.3.1 Textualism and Human Rights Issues in the Vavilov Case|36
3|1.3.2 `Principled Judicial Activism´ in Defense of Human Rights and the Democratic Rule of Law|50
3|1.3.3 Judicial Activism in Defense of the Vulnerable|56
2|References|58
2|Literature|58
2|Materials|58
2|Cases|59
1|Chapter 2: The Supreme Court of the United States and Judicial Activism in the Trump Era|60
2|2.1 Introduction|60
2|2.2 Case 1: Rucho et al. v. Common Cause et al. No. 18-422. Argued March 26, 2019-Decided June 27, 2019 (United States Supreme...|62
2|2.3 Case 2: Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, In...|68
2|2.4 Case 3: Garza (Guardian ad litem for J.D.) v. Hargan (Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services) et al. 874 F.3d 735 (...|82
2|2.5 The Supreme Court of the United States Holding in Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. v. Plan...|85
2|2.6 Case 4: Gamble v United States No. 17-646. Argued December 6, 2018-Decided June 17, 2019 (United States Supreme Court, 201...|99
2|2.7 Case 5: American Legion v. American Humanist Association, No. 17-1717 (Decided 20 June, 2019) (United States Supreme Court...|113
2|2.8 Case 6: Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972) (United States Supreme Court) (A Judicial Dissent Asserting Children´s Au...|121
2|References|131
2|Literature|131
2|Materials|131
2|Cases|132
1|Chapter 3: Judicial Activism in Selected Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of Canada|134
2|3.1 Introduction|134
2|3.2 Case 1: Gillian Frank and Jamie Duong v Attorney General of Canada [Frank v Canada] 2019 SCC 1 Decided 11 January, 2019 (S...|138
2|3.3 Case 2: Fitzgerald (Next Friend) v Alberta A.J. No. 1544, 2002 ABQB 1086; (2004) A.J. No. 570, 2004 ABCA 184 (Court of App...|154
2|3.4 Case 3: Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Attorney General (Canada) 2004 1 SCC 76 (Supreme Court of Ca...|182
3|3.4.1 The Canadian Charter s. 7 `Security of the Person´ Issue in Canadian Foundation|183
3|3.4.2 The Canadian Charter s. 15 `Equality Under the Law´ and `Equal Benefit of the Law´ Issue in Canadian Foundation|188
3|3.4.3 The s. 12 Charter Protection Against Cruel and Unusual Treatment or Punishment Issue in Canadian Foundation|194
2|References|198
2|Literature|198
2|Materials|198
2|Cases|199
1|Chapter 4: Judicial Activism, the `Living Instrument´ Doctrine and the European Court of Human Rights|200
2|4.1 Introduction|200
2|4.2 Case 1: Case of Golder v. The United Kingdom (Application No. 4451/70) Judgement 21 February, 1975 (European Court of Huma...|203
2|4.3 Case 2: Volodina v Russia (Application No. 41261/17) Judgment 9 July, 2019 (European Court of Human Rights) (On the Questi...|216
2|4.4 Case 3: X v The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Application No. 29683/16) Judgement 17 January, 2019 (European Cour...|223
2|References|239
2|Literature|239
2|Materials|239
2|Cases|240
1|Chapter 5: `Principled Judicial Activism´ in Defense of Our Common Humanity|241
2|5.1 Introduction|241
2|5.2 Case 1: Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Gize Yebeyo Araya, et al. SCC, Docket 37919, Judgment Pending (Supreme Court of Canada, J...|244
2|5.3 Case 2: Jesner et al. v Arab Bank PLC (Supreme Court of the United States) Judgement 24 April, 2018, 138 S. Ct. 1386 (2018...|263
2|References|268
2|Literature|268
2|Materials|269
2|Cases|269
1|Chapter 6: Concluding Comment|271
2|References|275
2|Literature|275
2|Materials|276
2|Cases|276
1|Index|278