File #2763: "2019_Book_AssessingJudicialReformsInDeve.pdf"
Testo
1|Foreword|6
1|Preface|9
1|Acknowledgements|11
1|Contents|12
1|List of Figures|16
1|List of Tables|18
1|1 Introduction|20
2|1.1 The Problem|20
3|1.1.1 Democratisation|20
3|1.1.2 Procedural Justice|22
3|1.1.3 Crime Surveys|22
2|1.2 Fields of Application|23
2|1.3 Book Structure|23
2|References|24
1|2 An Overview of Judicial Reform in Latin America|26
2|2.1 General|26
2|2.2 The New Debate on Law and Development|26
3|2.2.1 The Case of Chile|30
2|2.3 Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: A Brief Account of Chilean Criminal Policy Reforms|33
3|2.3.1 Criminal Policy Changes in Chile|34
3|2.3.2 Changes to the Chilean Judiciary|39
2|2.4 The CPR|40
3|2.4.1 Previous Criminal Procedure|40
3|2.4.2 The New Procedure|42
3|2.4.3 The CPR’s Model of Implementation|45
2|2.5 The CPR as a Public Policy|47
2|2.6 Stakeholders in the Implementation of the CPR|48
2|2.7 Conclusions|51
2|References|52
1|3 The Analysis of Trust and Criminal Justice: Between Legitimacy and Order|55
2|3.1 General|55
2|3.2 An Informational Bases Approach to Law and Order|55
3|3.2.1 The Idea of Informational Basis: Sen|56
2|3.3 A Rational Choice Approach to Crime Control|57
2|3.4 Law and Order and Procedural Justice|59
3|3.4.1 The Procedural Justice Approach|60
2|3.5 Procedural Justice and Theories of Legitimacy|62
2|3.6 Inequality and Legitimacy: Sociological Intakes into Procedural Justice|65
2|3.7 Conclusion|68
2|References|70
1|4 The Analysis of Attitudinal Information in Crime Surveys|73
2|4.1 General|73
2|4.2 Crime Surveys as an Intellectual Project|73
3|4.2.1 Crime Surveys as a Criminological Project|74
3|4.2.2 The Ambiguous Academic Standing on Crime Surveys|76
2|4.3 Crime Control and Victimisation Surveys|78
2|4.4 Subjective Information and Crime Surveys|80
3|4.4.1 The Invention of Fear of Crime|81
2|4.5 The Critique of Critical Criminology and the Politics of Law and Order|83
2|4.6 Subjective Information as a Managerial Tool: The Search for Public Opinion|86
3|4.6.1 Analysis of the Police—Are We Doing Well?|86
3|4.6.2 The Analysis of Attitudes to Punishment: Are We Giving the People What They Want?|87
2|4.7 Conclusions: The Limits of the Homo Economicus in Criminal Policy|89
2|References|91
1|5 The Assessment of a Judicial Reform Through Public Opinion: Theoretical and Methodological Issues|95
2|5.1 Trust in Law and Confidence in Justice|95
2|5.2 The Meaning of Trust|95
2|5.3 Between Trust and Confidence|97
2|5.4 Legitimacy|98
2|5.5 The Temporal Dimension of Trust|98
2|5.6 Opinions, Attitudes and Behaviours: What Is Trust?|100
2|5.7 Behaviours, Opinions and Attitudes in Criminal Justice|101
2|5.8 Why Analyse Trust in Law for Judicial Reform?|102
2|5.9 How to Assess a Judicial Reform?|104
2|5.10 Data Sources: How to Assess the Effects of Chilean Criminal Procedure Reform?|105
3|5.10.1 The Chilean Crime Survey|106
3|5.10.2 The CPR Model of Implementation|107
3|5.10.3 Analysis of the CPR’s Effects on Confidence in Justice Through the CCS|108
2|5.11 Research Question|109
2|5.12 Objectives|109
2|5.13 Hypotheses Under Test|110
2|5.14 Methods|110
2|References|111
1|6 An Overview of the Effects of the Chilean Criminal Procedure Reform|113
2|6.1 General|113
2|6.2 Victimisation and Reporting Practices|113
2|6.3 Fear of Crime and Protective Measures|118
2|6.4 Carrying Firearms and the State’s Monopoly on the Legitimate Physical Violence|121
2|6.5 Public Opinion and Criminal Justice: People Talking About Criminal Justice Institutions|122
2|6.6 Conclusions|126
2|References|126
1|7 Trust in the Criminal Justice System and Judicial Reform: A Pseudo-panel Analysis|128
2|7.1 The Problem|128
2|7.2 Methods|128
3|7.2.1 The Data|129
2|7.3 Results|129
3|7.3.1 Is Trust in the CJS a Stable Attitude?|131
3|7.3.2 The Effect of Trust in the CJS on Perceptions of Victimisation Over Time|132
3|7.3.3 The Effect of CPR on Trust in the Criminal Justice System|133
2|References|134
1|8 The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence and Trust in the Courts|135
2|8.1 Evaluating the Courts|135
2|8.2 Results|137
3|8.2.1 Creation of Comparison Groups|137
3|8.2.2 Adaptation of Toharia’s Model of Public Opinion Assessment|137
3|8.2.3 Descriptive Analysis: General Public|139
3|8.2.4 Descriptive Analysis: Users|141
2|8.3 Estimating Loyalty: General Public|142
2|8.4 Conclusions|144
2|References|145
1|9 The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence in Policing|146
2|9.1 General|146
2|9.2 The Chilean Law Enforcement System|146
2|9.3 Changes in Policing as a Result of the Reform|147
2|9.4 Changes in Support for the Police|147
2|9.5 Individual-Level Effects in Police Support|148
3|9.5.1 Age Groups|150
3|9.5.2 Gender|152
3|9.5.3 Socio-economic Strata|152
3|9.5.4 Stages of the CPR|154
3|9.5.5 Victimisation|155
3|9.5.6 Educational Levels|156
2|9.6 Changes in Public Perception of the Police|156
2|References|157
1|10 Confidence in Policing and Crime Reporting in Chile|158
2|10.1 General|158
2|10.2 Measuring Attitudes Towards Police|159
3|10.2.1 Trust in Carabineros|159
3|10.2.2 Confidence in the Police|160
3|10.2.3 Carabineros: Law Enforcement|160
3|10.2.4 Carabineros: Community Engagement|160
3|10.2.5 Policia de Investigaciones: Law Enforcement|161
2|10.3 Are Attitudes Towards the Police Affected by the CPR?|162
3|10.3.1 Trust in Carabineros|162
3|10.3.2 Confidence in the Police: Carabineros (Law Enforcement)|162
3|10.3.3 Confidence in the Police: Carabineros (Community Engagement)|163
3|10.3.4 Confidence in the Police: Policia de Investigaciones (Law Enforcement)|163
2|10.4 The Effect of Attitudes Towards the Police in Reporting Crime|163
2|10.5 Methods|164
2|10.6 Results|165
2|References|170
1|11 Conclusions|171
2|11.1 General|171
2|References|174
1|Index|176
1|Preface|9
1|Acknowledgements|11
1|Contents|12
1|List of Figures|16
1|List of Tables|18
1|1 Introduction|20
2|1.1 The Problem|20
3|1.1.1 Democratisation|20
3|1.1.2 Procedural Justice|22
3|1.1.3 Crime Surveys|22
2|1.2 Fields of Application|23
2|1.3 Book Structure|23
2|References|24
1|2 An Overview of Judicial Reform in Latin America|26
2|2.1 General|26
2|2.2 The New Debate on Law and Development|26
3|2.2.1 The Case of Chile|30
2|2.3 Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: A Brief Account of Chilean Criminal Policy Reforms|33
3|2.3.1 Criminal Policy Changes in Chile|34
3|2.3.2 Changes to the Chilean Judiciary|39
2|2.4 The CPR|40
3|2.4.1 Previous Criminal Procedure|40
3|2.4.2 The New Procedure|42
3|2.4.3 The CPR’s Model of Implementation|45
2|2.5 The CPR as a Public Policy|47
2|2.6 Stakeholders in the Implementation of the CPR|48
2|2.7 Conclusions|51
2|References|52
1|3 The Analysis of Trust and Criminal Justice: Between Legitimacy and Order|55
2|3.1 General|55
2|3.2 An Informational Bases Approach to Law and Order|55
3|3.2.1 The Idea of Informational Basis: Sen|56
2|3.3 A Rational Choice Approach to Crime Control|57
2|3.4 Law and Order and Procedural Justice|59
3|3.4.1 The Procedural Justice Approach|60
2|3.5 Procedural Justice and Theories of Legitimacy|62
2|3.6 Inequality and Legitimacy: Sociological Intakes into Procedural Justice|65
2|3.7 Conclusion|68
2|References|70
1|4 The Analysis of Attitudinal Information in Crime Surveys|73
2|4.1 General|73
2|4.2 Crime Surveys as an Intellectual Project|73
3|4.2.1 Crime Surveys as a Criminological Project|74
3|4.2.2 The Ambiguous Academic Standing on Crime Surveys|76
2|4.3 Crime Control and Victimisation Surveys|78
2|4.4 Subjective Information and Crime Surveys|80
3|4.4.1 The Invention of Fear of Crime|81
2|4.5 The Critique of Critical Criminology and the Politics of Law and Order|83
2|4.6 Subjective Information as a Managerial Tool: The Search for Public Opinion|86
3|4.6.1 Analysis of the Police—Are We Doing Well?|86
3|4.6.2 The Analysis of Attitudes to Punishment: Are We Giving the People What They Want?|87
2|4.7 Conclusions: The Limits of the Homo Economicus in Criminal Policy|89
2|References|91
1|5 The Assessment of a Judicial Reform Through Public Opinion: Theoretical and Methodological Issues|95
2|5.1 Trust in Law and Confidence in Justice|95
2|5.2 The Meaning of Trust|95
2|5.3 Between Trust and Confidence|97
2|5.4 Legitimacy|98
2|5.5 The Temporal Dimension of Trust|98
2|5.6 Opinions, Attitudes and Behaviours: What Is Trust?|100
2|5.7 Behaviours, Opinions and Attitudes in Criminal Justice|101
2|5.8 Why Analyse Trust in Law for Judicial Reform?|102
2|5.9 How to Assess a Judicial Reform?|104
2|5.10 Data Sources: How to Assess the Effects of Chilean Criminal Procedure Reform?|105
3|5.10.1 The Chilean Crime Survey|106
3|5.10.2 The CPR Model of Implementation|107
3|5.10.3 Analysis of the CPR’s Effects on Confidence in Justice Through the CCS|108
2|5.11 Research Question|109
2|5.12 Objectives|109
2|5.13 Hypotheses Under Test|110
2|5.14 Methods|110
2|References|111
1|6 An Overview of the Effects of the Chilean Criminal Procedure Reform|113
2|6.1 General|113
2|6.2 Victimisation and Reporting Practices|113
2|6.3 Fear of Crime and Protective Measures|118
2|6.4 Carrying Firearms and the State’s Monopoly on the Legitimate Physical Violence|121
2|6.5 Public Opinion and Criminal Justice: People Talking About Criminal Justice Institutions|122
2|6.6 Conclusions|126
2|References|126
1|7 Trust in the Criminal Justice System and Judicial Reform: A Pseudo-panel Analysis|128
2|7.1 The Problem|128
2|7.2 Methods|128
3|7.2.1 The Data|129
2|7.3 Results|129
3|7.3.1 Is Trust in the CJS a Stable Attitude?|131
3|7.3.2 The Effect of Trust in the CJS on Perceptions of Victimisation Over Time|132
3|7.3.3 The Effect of CPR on Trust in the Criminal Justice System|133
2|References|134
1|8 The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence and Trust in the Courts|135
2|8.1 Evaluating the Courts|135
2|8.2 Results|137
3|8.2.1 Creation of Comparison Groups|137
3|8.2.2 Adaptation of Toharia’s Model of Public Opinion Assessment|137
3|8.2.3 Descriptive Analysis: General Public|139
3|8.2.4 Descriptive Analysis: Users|141
2|8.3 Estimating Loyalty: General Public|142
2|8.4 Conclusions|144
2|References|145
1|9 The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence in Policing|146
2|9.1 General|146
2|9.2 The Chilean Law Enforcement System|146
2|9.3 Changes in Policing as a Result of the Reform|147
2|9.4 Changes in Support for the Police|147
2|9.5 Individual-Level Effects in Police Support|148
3|9.5.1 Age Groups|150
3|9.5.2 Gender|152
3|9.5.3 Socio-economic Strata|152
3|9.5.4 Stages of the CPR|154
3|9.5.5 Victimisation|155
3|9.5.6 Educational Levels|156
2|9.6 Changes in Public Perception of the Police|156
2|References|157
1|10 Confidence in Policing and Crime Reporting in Chile|158
2|10.1 General|158
2|10.2 Measuring Attitudes Towards Police|159
3|10.2.1 Trust in Carabineros|159
3|10.2.2 Confidence in the Police|160
3|10.2.3 Carabineros: Law Enforcement|160
3|10.2.4 Carabineros: Community Engagement|160
3|10.2.5 Policia de Investigaciones: Law Enforcement|161
2|10.3 Are Attitudes Towards the Police Affected by the CPR?|162
3|10.3.1 Trust in Carabineros|162
3|10.3.2 Confidence in the Police: Carabineros (Law Enforcement)|162
3|10.3.3 Confidence in the Police: Carabineros (Community Engagement)|163
3|10.3.4 Confidence in the Police: Policia de Investigaciones (Law Enforcement)|163
2|10.4 The Effect of Attitudes Towards the Police in Reporting Crime|163
2|10.5 Methods|164
2|10.6 Results|165
2|References|170
1|11 Conclusions|171
2|11.1 General|171
2|References|174
1|Index|176