Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? : a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules / Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter, editors.

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? : a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules / Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter, editors.

Title from PDF of title page (viewed, Dec. 4, 2019)

This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.

Springer Open,

Gless, Sabine.

Richter, Thomas.

SpringerLink (Online service)

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2

1 online resource (xv, 380 p.) : ill.

eng

a

Publisher's Web site. Access restricted to the University of Catania community.

10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 doi

9783030125196 (print)

9783030125202 (electronic bk.)

3030125203 (electronic bk.)

9783030125196 (print)

Ius Gentium, 1534-6781 ; volume 74

Ius gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ; v. 74.