File #2777: "2019_Book_ContagionCounter-TerrorismAndC.pdf"

2019_Book_ContagionCounter-TerrorismAndC.pdf

Testo

1|Series Editor’s Preface|7
1|Acknowledgements|9
1|Contents|10
1|Table of Statutes|11
1|1: Introduction: Counter-Terrorism and the ‘Contagion Thesis’|14
2|Europe’s Expanding Security State|14
2|The ‘Contagion Thesis’|17
2|Who to Compare and Why?|20
2|Plan of the Book|22
2|References|23
1|2: Counter-Terrorism in the UK|27
2|Introduction|28
2|Background|28
2|Counter-Terrorism After 9/11|30
3|Domestic Legislation|30
4|Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001|32
4|Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005|33
4|Terrorism Act 2006|34
4|Counter-Terrorism Act 2008|34
4|Terrorist Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011|35
4|Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015|35
3|European Legislation|36
4|Criminalisation of Terrorist Activity|37
4|European Arrest Warrant|38
4|‘Blacklisting’ Orders|39
2|Forms of Contagion in the UK|40
3|Use of Terrorism as a ‘Picklock’|41
3|‘Blank Cheque’ Legislation|43
3|The ‘New Normal’|47
4|Civil Law Measures|47
4|The Principle of Open Justice|49
2|Conclusions|50
2|References|53
1|3: Counter-Terrorism in Poland|60
2|Introduction|61
2|Background|61
2|Counter-Terrorism After 9/11|63
3|European Legislation|64
3|Domestic Legislation|66
2|Forms of Contagion in Poland|70
3|Use of Terrorism as a ‘Picklock’|70
3|‘Blank Cheque’ Legislation|72
3|The ‘New Normal’|74
2|Conclusions|75
2|References|79
1|4: Counter-Terrorism in France|86
2|Introduction|87
2|Background|87
2|Counter-Terrorism After 9/11|89
3|Domestic Legislation|89
4|Law on Daily Security 20018|90
4|Law on Internal Security 20039|90
4|Law to Adapt Justice to the Evolutions of Criminality 200410 (Law Perben II)|91
4|Law on the Fight Against Terrorism and Containing Various Provisions Concerning Security and Border Controls 200611|92
4|Law on Security and Action Against Terrorism 201213|92
4|Law Strengthening Provisions in the Fight Against Terrorism 201414|93
4|Law on Intelligence 201516|93
4|Decree Implementing State of Emergency Law—14 November 201517|94
4|Law Extending the State of Emergency and Strengthening the Effectiveness of Its Provisions—20 November 201518|94
4|Law Strengthening the Fight Against Organised Crime, Terrorism and Their Financing, and Improving the Efficiency and Guarantees of Criminal Proceedings—June 201619|95
4|Law Extending the State of Emergency and Introducing Measures to Strengthen the Fight Against Terrorism—July 201620|95
4|Law on Public Security—February 201721|96
4|Law Reinforcing Domestic Security and the Fight Against Terrorism—October 201724|96
3|European Legislation|97
2|Forms of Contagion in France|98
3|Use of Terrorism as a ‘Picklock’|98
3|‘Blank Cheque’ Legislation|101
3|The ‘New Normal’|104
2|Conclusions|108
2|References|114
1|5: A Precautionary Consensus?|120
2|Introduction|120
2|Precautionary Logic|121
3|‘All-Risks’ Policing Powers|122
3|Mass Surveillance|123
3|Deviation from ‘Ordinary’ Criminal Law Norms|124
3|Spread of Precursor Offences|125
3|Broadly Drawn Terrorist Offences and Wide Discretionary Powers|127
2|The Precautionary Consensus and the Role of Policy Transfer|128
2|Conclusions|132
2|References|134
1|6: Contagion, Counter-Terrorism and Criminology: Strategies for Contestation?|140
2|Introduction|141
2|Contagion, Counter-Terrorism and Criminology|141
2|Criminology, Governmentality and the Limits of Human Rights|145
2|Conclusion|151
2|References|152
1|Index|157